Are you really surprised that a relationship built solely because some asshole arbitrarily assigned one person to mind the other one isn't really successful?
I prefer to operate on a more "you get what you give" ideal. If the attitude is to not jump in head first and try, then, no, it's hardly surprising it won't work out. But an attempt ought to be made before failure is declared.
I see no reason not to treat it as though it were a permanent assignment, but I also see no reason in pushing you into such an agreement. It's meant to be a partnership, after all.
A fact which I regret and cannot change, nor can I claim to understand why I've ended up on this side of things and not the other, but success is futile if the pairing won't work together.
[She isn't sorry, not really. Someday maybe but she doesn't have the energy right now.
The problem is, she promised Jesus she'd try. And regardless of her assessment of the situation, of its likely outcome, she does still want to be someone who keeps her word.
A trait all cosmic beings seem to share. At least the Admirable seems to have an interest in preserving those here. Some in his position would just leave us to die.
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
And you're here as an inmate's assigned temporary warden.
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
Partnership?
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
We're not.
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
Re: audio;
audio; A Day Later
The problem is, she promised Jesus she'd try. And regardless of her assessment of the situation, of its likely outcome, she does still want to be someone who keeps her word.
So, a day or so later, out of nowhere:]
I hate this system.
Re: audio
Well.
This is an unexpected but not entirely unwelcome surprise. )
It certainly has its flaws, to be sure.
Re: audio
Nothing about it is sustainable, except that no one can push back against the Admiral, which makes it a dictatorship.
Re: audio
Re: audio
There's a time and a place for it.
Re: audio